11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81:
Line 81: + +
Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct? (view source)
Revision as of 14:49, October 5, 2008
, 14:49, October 5, 2008no edit summary
I understand that most of the people on this site would disagree with me, but I understand the difference between faith and empirical knowledge. Faith does not provide "truth" in the way that most of the users here would claim it does, but that does not render it invalid or wrong. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 18:52, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
I understand that most of the people on this site would disagree with me, but I understand the difference between faith and empirical knowledge. Faith does not provide "truth" in the way that most of the users here would claim it does, but that does not render it invalid or wrong. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 18:52, 31 May 2008 (EDT)
:Faith provides that truth which can only have a supernatural source, such as the existence of sin and the means of salvation. [[User:SarahFan|SarahFan]] 10:49, 5 October 2008 (EDT)