| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| | # [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed | | # [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed |
| | # carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk | | # carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk |
| − | # requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency
| + | |
| | # insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm | | # insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm |
| | # insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while censorship for anything is [[Christian]] | | # insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while censorship for anything is [[Christian]] |
| − | # insisting that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease
| + | |
| | # insisting that premarital sex is fine | | # insisting that premarital sex is fine |
| − | # insisting that increasing taxes must increase government revenue, when often people just work less and revenues then decline
| + | |
| − | # denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
| + | |
| − | # Even though the [[Supreme Court]] overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, [[Roe v. Wade]] cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)<ref>See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.</ref>
| + | |
| | # The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but [[liberals]] find that illogical today. This does not mean to replace the word 'she' on the article for Hillary Clinton with 'he'. | | # The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but [[liberals]] find that illogical today. This does not mean to replace the word 'she' on the article for Hillary Clinton with 'he'. |
| | | | |