nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: +
You misrepresented what I said, and have some strange ideas.
Whether or not Time has a liberal/conservative bias is one thing (of which I have no concern) but just because it reports on evolution is not to say its not balanced scientifically. It reports on current affairs and some of those current affairs may be about evolution. Are you suggesting that anytime, in any publication, that says something about evolution of 'old earth' that it should also say that it may not be true? It would take a lot of magazine space to put both sides of the story. Dont they have other religious magazines for that purpose? Time, New Scientist, SA, what have you, all express the accepted scientific posistion (which is '''not''' YEC or creation). That doesnt make it unbalanced.
Whether or not Time has a liberal/conservative bias is one thing (of which I have no concern) but just because it reports on evolution is not to say its not balanced scientifically. It reports on current affairs and some of those current affairs may be about evolution. Are you suggesting that anytime, in any publication, that says something about evolution of 'old earth' that it should also say that it may not be true? It would take a lot of magazine space to put both sides of the story. Dont they have other religious magazines for that purpose? Time, New Scientist, SA, what have you, all express the accepted scientific posistion (which is '''not''' YEC or creation). That doesnt make it unbalanced.
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 05:51, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 05:51, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
: I didn't say that it "reports on" evolution, but that it ''promotes'' it. No, I'm not saying that every time any publication says "something" about evolution that it should also say that it may not be true. But it's hardly fair if it ''never'' says it, is it? And what do "religious magazines" have to do with a ''scientific'' model? And are you ''seriously'' saying that ''only'' the "accepted" scientific position should be reported on, and that competing views should never be covered? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:38, 5 June 2008 (EDT)