1,352
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: +
no edit summary
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 05:51, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 05:51, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
: I didn't say that it "reports on" evolution, but that it ''promotes'' it. No, I'm not saying that every time any publication says "something" about evolution that it should also say that it may not be true. But it's hardly fair if it ''never'' says it, is it? And what do "religious magazines" have to do with a ''scientific'' model? And are you ''seriously'' saying that ''only'' the "accepted" scientific position should be reported on, and that competing views should never be covered? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:38, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
: I didn't say that it "reports on" evolution, but that it ''promotes'' it. No, I'm not saying that every time any publication says "something" about evolution that it should also say that it may not be true. But it's hardly fair if it ''never'' says it, is it? And what do "religious magazines" have to do with a ''scientific'' model? And are you ''seriously'' saying that ''only'' the "accepted" scientific position should be reported on, and that competing views should never be covered? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:38, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::I think Time is trying to be ''accurate'', not balanced between truth and falsehood. How often are competing views covered and treated equally on CP? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 09:59, 5 June 2008 (EDT)