nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + +
Evidence of Time not being interested in the truth, and example of Conservapedia setting the example of covering both sides.
: I didn't say that it "reports on" evolution, but that it ''promotes'' it. No, I'm not saying that every time any publication says "something" about evolution that it should also say that it may not be true. But it's hardly fair if it ''never'' says it, is it? And what do "religious magazines" have to do with a ''scientific'' model? And are you ''seriously'' saying that ''only'' the "accepted" scientific position should be reported on, and that competing views should never be covered? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:38, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
: I didn't say that it "reports on" evolution, but that it ''promotes'' it. No, I'm not saying that every time any publication says "something" about evolution that it should also say that it may not be true. But it's hardly fair if it ''never'' says it, is it? And what do "religious magazines" have to do with a ''scientific'' model? And are you ''seriously'' saying that ''only'' the "accepted" scientific position should be reported on, and that competing views should never be covered? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:38, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::I think Time is trying to be ''accurate'', not balanced between truth and falsehood. How often are competing views covered and treated equally on CP? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 09:59, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::I think Time is trying to be ''accurate'', not balanced between truth and falsehood. How often are competing views covered and treated equally on CP? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 09:59, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::: Is it really trying to be accurate? I suppose in their minds they are, but when they continually repeat error that's been pointed out to them[http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/3760/86/], can you really argue that?
::: As for Conservapedia, you will see many of our articles (e.g. [[dinosaur]]) covers ''both'' the evolutionary and creationary views, unlike Wikipedia and most of the secular media.
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:54, 5 June 2008 (EDT)