nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: +
→List of subjects: I agree
: Jimxchue didn't exactly "add it back in". His new list was significantly shorter, and is now described as "regularly covered topics", and there was an edit comment by way of (brief) explanation. That's not to say that the list should be there, but to point out that it's not a straight reversion without any explanation. I do, however, think there is merit in listing her key topics, so perhaps it ''should'' be there? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:14, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
: Jimxchue didn't exactly "add it back in". His new list was significantly shorter, and is now described as "regularly covered topics", and there was an edit comment by way of (brief) explanation. That's not to say that the list should be there, but to point out that it's not a straight reversion without any explanation. I do, however, think there is merit in listing her key topics, so perhaps it ''should'' be there? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:14, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
::I agree there is merit in listing topics she commonly covers ("Malkin regularly writes about immigration issues, environmental alarmism...") and so on, but to advertise so blatantly seems fairly unencyclopedic.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 18:56, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
::I agree there is merit in listing topics she commonly covers ("Malkin regularly writes about immigration issues, environmental alarmism...") and so on, but to advertise so blatantly seems fairly unencyclopedic.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 18:56, 8 June 2008 (EDT)
::: I was going to ask if there is also merit in linking to examples of her columns (trying to justify what was there), but looking at this more closely, it ''is'' effectively just promoting her writing, and there's too many topics to list them all in a paragraph as you suggest. So I now actually agree with you that it shouldn't be like it is. If this is possible, we should pick out her four or five most representative themes and mention (and link to?) them. We should "consolidate" her topics (e.g. "politics" instead of "politics", "politicians", "immigration", etc.). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:56, 8 June 2008 (EDT)