Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
formatting, added another example to have one for each of the three flawed deductions
Line 10: Line 10:  
This is flawed because:
 
This is flawed because:
   −
#There may be a confounding factor causing A ''and'' B
+
#There may be a third, confounding variable C which causes A ''and'' B
 
#B may cause A
 
#B may cause A
 
#The relationship may be a complete coincidence
 
#The relationship may be a complete coincidence
Line 16: Line 16:  
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
   −
#As sales of ice cream rise, so do reports of shark attacks
+
1.
−
#High sales of ice cream cause shark attacks
+
 
 +
Hypothesis: As sales of ice cream rise, so do reports of shark attacks.
 +
 
 +
Conclusion: High sales of ice cream cause shark attacks.
    
'''Flaw:''' Shark attacks and ice cream sales follow a seasonal pattern. Both rise in the summer months. The seasons are a confounding variable.
 
'''Flaw:''' Shark attacks and ice cream sales follow a seasonal pattern. Both rise in the summer months. The seasons are a confounding variable.
   −
#Since the construction of a stadium began in Alaska, the value of your home in Texas has risen
+
2.
−
#Stadium construction in Alaska causes higher home values in Texas
+
 
 +
Hypothesis: The more people convert to Christianity, the more powerful God becomes.
 +
 
 +
Conclusion: God gains power from his followers.
 +
 
 +
'''Flaw:''' God is already all-powerful. His magnificence is what draws people to conversion. B causes A.
 +
 
 +
3.
 +
 
 +
Hypothesis: Since the construction of a stadium began in Alaska, the value of your home in Texas has risen.
 +
 
 +
Conclusion: Stadium construction in Alaska causes higher home values in Texas.
    
'''Flaw:''' This is a coincidence between unrelated variables.
 
'''Flaw:''' This is a coincidence between unrelated variables.
4,781

edits

Navigation menu