250
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: + +
Reply
I admit no such thing. Those cases you've cited are still open, as far as I'm concerned. And I ought to block you just for using words like "childish" even if it ''is'' on your talk page. Retract that remark right now or you ''will'' get blocked just for that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 19:27, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
I admit no such thing. Those cases you've cited are still open, as far as I'm concerned. And I ought to block you just for using words like "childish" even if it ''is'' on your talk page. Retract that remark right now or you ''will'' get blocked just for that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 19:27, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
:So until they die having committed no further terrorist act you will not be convinced that a single person released from Guantanamo has not returned (or turned) to being a terrorist? David Hicks was one of the most publicised trials (to the best of my knowledge being the first). I would be surprised if anyone could claim knowledge about Guantanamo or its prisoners without knowing his name. [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 19:30, 14 June 2008 (EDT)