Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:  
As should be obvious to anyone now, Joaquin has decided he doesn't want to discuss his edits, he just wants to keep making them over and over.  Seven, eight times now.  I have brought this to his attention almost as many times on his user talk, but he ignores me.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:01, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
As should be obvious to anyone now, Joaquin has decided he doesn't want to discuss his edits, he just wants to keep making them over and over.  Seven, eight times now.  I have brought this to his attention almost as many times on his user talk, but he ignores me.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:01, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:Tom you may want to just let it go.  It would appear that Joaquin believes you are nitpicking and that any "debate" on it is a waste of his time.  He would rather create.  Perhaps he feels the blockquote indentation simply gives it a better layout.  Is it that important?  You've expressed your concerns and been true to your own beliefs.  Now it may be best to just move on. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:29, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:Tom you may want to just let it go.  It would appear that Joaquin believes you are nitpicking and that any "debate" on it is a waste of his time.  He would rather create.  Perhaps he feels the blockquote indentation simply gives it a better layout.  Is it that important?  You've expressed your concerns and been true to your own beliefs.  Now it may be best to just move on. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:29, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::That is in no way fair.  Blockquoting like that may make it look better on his screen, but because people have a varying size of screen or windows to view the page, it makes it look awful in other resolutions.  This is one of the basic principles for web pages and the way HTML and by extension wiki markup was designed.
 +
::The issue here is not that I am right and he is wrong, although I do obviously think I am correct.  It's that he has reverted continually, ignoring my pleas to discuss it and perhaps compromise on a solution.  I don't think it is best to move on, because the next time he edits an article we both happen to work on, and we disagree, I will have set a precedent that he can just refuse to cooperate or collaborate.
 +
::It is not unreasonable to ask him to at least acknowledge the discussion and perhaps even explain himself.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:39, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Joaquin, it would probably be best to explain the reversions, because some clean up could be useful. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:31, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Joaquin, it would probably be best to explain the reversions, because some clean up could be useful. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:31, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
789

edits

Navigation menu