Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:  
::It is not unreasonable to ask him to at least acknowledge the discussion and perhaps even explain himself.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:39, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::It is not unreasonable to ask him to at least acknowledge the discussion and perhaps even explain himself.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:39, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Joaquin, it would probably be best to explain the reversions, because some clean up could be useful. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:31, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Joaquin, it would probably be best to explain the reversions, because some clean up could be useful. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:31, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Yes, I am sure the article could be better. What we need to have clear is the procedure. It is not acceptable to delete important information or images without the opinion of other editors. You can not ask for explanations when you dont give explanations or wait for a reply. The image of Pericles is necessary. It is infront of his name and represent an important time of Greek development. Images do what words can not do. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:34, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, Administrators
22,417

edits

Navigation menu