789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 140:
Line 140: + + +
Talk:Essay:A Challenge to Creationists (view source)
Revision as of 18:27, June 17, 2008
, 18:27, June 17, 2008no edit summary
I understand this isn't quite what you said, but it eventually led to it, so while I do not necessarily direct this to you, Ymmtrojam, I certainly direct it at a few of the members of this site. Thanks, and Lightspeed.--[[User:JackSmith|JackSmith]] 14:11, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
I understand this isn't quite what you said, but it eventually led to it, so while I do not necessarily direct this to you, Ymmtrojam, I certainly direct it at a few of the members of this site. Thanks, and Lightspeed.--[[User:JackSmith|JackSmith]] 14:11, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
==Absurd==
This is just silly. The vast majority of creationists are not like PJR: they do not have even the skein of science over it. While I think he is wrong and so are the "creation scientists" who go through their elaborate contortions, they are a step up from the average. The average creationist believes God created the world, and that is that. Nothing more to it. If there is any proof otherwise, they believe he created it and so it is moot. This is why I am a Last Thursdayist, since I think the universe was created last Thursday, somewhere around three in the afternoon. It's also why this challenge is pointless. And even if it wasn't, it is irrational and poorly phrased. Knock it off and quit being a Hitchens, JackSmith.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:27, 17 June 2008 (EDT)