Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:     
:This is an absurd debate topic. It would be like the prosecution in a murder trial asking the defendant "If you did commit the murder, how would you have done it?" What possible use would any answer be other than to twist the defendant's words? Besides, we could better ask the Darwinist what he will do when he dies and finds himself before God and is compelled to answer why he was teaching falsehood. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 13:35, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:This is an absurd debate topic. It would be like the prosecution in a murder trial asking the defendant "If you did commit the murder, how would you have done it?" What possible use would any answer be other than to twist the defendant's words? Besides, we could better ask the Darwinist what he will do when he dies and finds himself before God and is compelled to answer why he was teaching falsehood. [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 13:35, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
This is kind of silly. If we hypothetically had time travel available to us, then why not simply go back to the life of Jesus? We could see firsthand if He did miracles, was resurrected, etc. That's more vital to Christianity than the Genesis issue. Even if the Genesis story isn’t literal that doesn’t destroy Christianity. But if Christ isn’t resurrected, then, as Paul put it “our faith is in vain.” (1 Corinthians 15:14.) [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 13:56, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
360

edits

Navigation menu