Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:     
This is kind of silly. If we hypothetically had time travel available to us, then why not simply go back to the life of Jesus? We could see firsthand if He did miracles, was resurrected, etc. That's more vital to Christianity than the Genesis issue. Even if the Genesis story isn’t literal that doesn’t destroy Christianity. But if Christ isn’t resurrected, then, as Paul put it “our faith is in vain.” (1 Corinthians 15:14.) [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 13:56, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 
This is kind of silly. If we hypothetically had time travel available to us, then why not simply go back to the life of Jesus? We could see firsthand if He did miracles, was resurrected, etc. That's more vital to Christianity than the Genesis issue. Even if the Genesis story isn’t literal that doesn’t destroy Christianity. But if Christ isn’t resurrected, then, as Paul put it “our faith is in vain.” (1 Corinthians 15:14.) [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 13:56, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
I wouldn't agree that this an absurd debate topic. I wanted to raise the question of what those with faith would do if they were to discover that their faith was unfounded (I am not excepting myself from this question). Perhaps I ought to rephrase it like that: what if time travel were to demonstrate that the basis of your religious beliefs was an untruth? --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 20:34, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
127

edits

Navigation menu