Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Undo revision 478060 by Humblpi (Talk)
Line 643: Line 643:     
::: Aaronp, either you're naive or you're engaging in bullying if you maintain that Lenski plans to release his raw data soon for independent, public review.  I asked him last Friday to release it, and his reply declined to do so.  I asked him again yesterday, and he predictably has not replied.  It now seems to me to be likely that the peer reviewers for his paper did not even see the raw data.  I think it's likely that only Lenski and his grad student have seen the raw data underlying that paper (note its footnote).  Don't pretend that Lenski welcomes independent review of the data.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:15, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::: Aaronp, either you're naive or you're engaging in bullying if you maintain that Lenski plans to release his raw data soon for independent, public review.  I asked him last Friday to release it, and his reply declined to do so.  I asked him again yesterday, and he predictably has not replied.  It now seems to me to be likely that the peer reviewers for his paper did not even see the raw data.  I think it's likely that only Lenski and his grad student have seen the raw data underlying that paper (note its footnote).  Don't pretend that Lenski welcomes independent review of the data.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:15, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
−
  −
::::So why don't you send him a third letter, and expose Conservapedia to yet more public ridicule? [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 15:39, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,898

edits

Navigation menu