| − | Having read the [ http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | + | Having read the [http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT) |
| | + | : I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT) |