Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Having read the [http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons.  Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph?  As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance?  If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Having read the [http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons.  Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph?  As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance?  If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
 
: I wouldn't defend it entirely.  For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced.  For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
 
: I wouldn't defend it entirely.  For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced.  For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::Right.  Okay, that's good.  I wonder if the poster, Ymmotrojam, agrees!-[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
33

edits

Navigation menu