Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
532 bytes removed ,  05:45, June 23, 2008
→‎Evidence: unless there is something in a particular flood account that directly relates to geology, I think it should be removed from this article and kept on the Great Flood article
Line 6: Line 6:  
== Evidence ==
 
== Evidence ==
 
Flood geologists base their belief in a relatively recent global deluge on several strands of evidence.  While none of these strands alone is sufficient to ''prove'' that a global flood occurred, flood geologists argue that a global deluge is the most reasonable and [[parsimonious]] explanation for the evidence.
 
Flood geologists base their belief in a relatively recent global deluge on several strands of evidence.  While none of these strands alone is sufficient to ''prove'' that a global flood occurred, flood geologists argue that a global deluge is the most reasonable and [[parsimonious]] explanation for the evidence.
  −
=== Ancient flood accounts ===
  −
All ancient cultures have stories about a global flood which destroyed the entire Earth.  A large number of them tell of a man who survived the flood by building a boat, or some other mechanism of surviving.  Flood geologists interpret these accounts as being cultural memories of a historical event, which have been corrupted over time. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/570/</ref>  They consider a historical flood to be the only reasonable explanation for the prevalence and similarly of the story.
      
=== Sedimentary rock ===
 
=== Sedimentary rock ===

Navigation menu