4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 921:
Line 921: + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 22:40, June 24, 2008
, 22:40, June 24, 2008→The Missing Link
Asking for the name of the site that was deliberately not mentioned requires an expectation that the unnamed site will be named, which is clearly ludicrous. My speculation is the same as CPAdmin1's. I don't think anything further can be gained by discussing this particular point, so apart from a totally new take on the issue with good reason, I'm declaring this particular discussion (regarding the site's name) now closed, and further discussion on it will result in blocks. Okay? (Too bad if it's not!). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Asking for the name of the site that was deliberately not mentioned requires an expectation that the unnamed site will be named, which is clearly ludicrous. My speculation is the same as CPAdmin1's. I don't think anything further can be gained by discussing this particular point, so apart from a totally new take on the issue with good reason, I'm declaring this particular discussion (regarding the site's name) now closed, and further discussion on it will result in blocks. Okay? (Too bad if it's not!). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
:What is ludicrous is that Lenski's response has been edited for no apparent reason. What is even more ludicrous is that those who ask about it are threatened with being blocked. This smacks of heavily of hypocrisy on a site that constantly decries censorship. --[[User:ProfHigginsPhD|ProfHigginsPhD]] 18:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
== "P.P.P.P.S.?" ==
== "P.P.P.P.S.?" ==