Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Less STD's?: new section
Line 124: Line 124:     
In Example 5, Kate starts out as a Conservative. But by the end of the example, she has an STD. Does this mean she's no longer a Conservative, since one of the benefits that Conservatives bring to the table is "freedom from sexually transmitted diseases"? If yes, it seems like a regrettably harsh and unfair outcome. Is there some means by which Kate can appeal this decision? [[User:Cua1101|Cua1101]] 14:34, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
In Example 5, Kate starts out as a Conservative. But by the end of the example, she has an STD. Does this mean she's no longer a Conservative, since one of the benefits that Conservatives bring to the table is "freedom from sexually transmitted diseases"? If yes, it seems like a regrettably harsh and unfair outcome. Is there some means by which Kate can appeal this decision? [[User:Cua1101|Cua1101]] 14:34, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Less STD's? ==
 +
 +
I was under the impression that Abstinence only education actually leads to higher rates of STD. I was also under the impression that conservatives are more likely to only receive abstinence only sexual education.
 +
 +
Also, rates of teenagers having sex is fairly identical for liberals and conservatives.
 +
 +
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9504871/
 +
 +
Also, if there going to be actual evidence and sources in this article or are you just going to have 5 first hand accounts that even IF they were true, would still mean nothing?

Navigation menu