| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | '''Richard Lenski''' is a professor of microbial [[ecology]] at Michigan State University. He holds a doctorate from the [[University of North Carolina]] and a B.A. from Oberlin College but, oddly, does not disclose his fields for those degrees on his own resume.<ref>https://www.msu.edu/~lenski/</ref> | | '''Richard Lenski''' is a professor of microbial [[ecology]] at Michigan State University. He holds a doctorate from the [[University of North Carolina]] and a B.A. from Oberlin College but, oddly, does not disclose his fields for those degrees on his own resume.<ref>https://www.msu.edu/~lenski/</ref> |
| | | | |
| − | Lenski is best known for his claim to have observed [[evolution]] of [[E. coli]] in a long-term laboratory study, insisting that it was not due to contamination. His 2008 paper asserting his claims was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking questions{{fact}} about the thoroughness of the review. | + | Lenski is best known for his claim to have observed [[evolution]] of [[E. coli]] in a long-term laboratory study, insisting that it was not due to contamination. His 2008 paper asserting his claims was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking questions<ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review. |
| | | | |
| | When Lenski received a public request for the data underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded. No one else has reproduced Lenski's findings. | | When Lenski received a public request for the data underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded. No one else has reproduced Lenski's findings. |
| Line 106: |
Line 106: |
| | Lenski's work has been criticized in the past also. In a paper Lenski published in ''Nature'' in May 8, 2003 entitled "The Evolutionary Origin of Complex Features," he described a computer simulation that contained no actual biology. In fact, the discussion section of the paper stated: | | Lenski's work has been criticized in the past also. In a paper Lenski published in ''Nature'' in May 8, 2003 entitled "The Evolutionary Origin of Complex Features," he described a computer simulation that contained no actual biology. In fact, the discussion section of the paper stated: |
| | | | |
| − | :"Some readers might suggest that we 'stacked the deck' by studying the evolution of a complex feature that could be built on simpler functions that | + | :"Some readers might suggest that we 'stacked the deck' by studying the evolution of a complex feature that could be built on simpler functions that were also useful. However, that is precisely what evolutionary theory requires ...." |
| − | were also useful. However, that is precisely what evolutionary theory requires ...." | |
| | | | |
| | Dr. William Dembski explained, "In other words, the computer programmers built into the simulation what they thought evolution needed to make it work. The validity of this study therefore depends on whether the simulation faithfully models biological reality."<ref>http://www.designinference.com/documents/2003.09.UncDiss_Intro_Contribs.pdf</ref> | | Dr. William Dembski explained, "In other words, the computer programmers built into the simulation what they thought evolution needed to make it work. The validity of this study therefore depends on whether the simulation faithfully models biological reality."<ref>http://www.designinference.com/documents/2003.09.UncDiss_Intro_Contribs.pdf</ref> |