1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − +
His paper was published in April 2008 - too recent to imply that the results are or are not reproducible
Lenski is best known for his claim to have observed [[evolution]] of [[E. coli]] in a long-term laboratory study, insisting that it was not due to contamination. His 2008 paper asserting his claims was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking questions<ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review.
Lenski is best known for his claim to have observed [[evolution]] of [[E. coli]] in a long-term laboratory study, insisting that it was not due to contamination. His 2008 paper asserting his claims was [[peer review]]ed in a mere 14 days, sparking questions<ref>See [[Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog]].</ref> about the thoroughness of the review.
When Lenski received a public request for the data underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded. No one else has reproduced Lenski's findings.
When Lenski received a public request for the data underlying for his published claims, he did not provide the actual data even though his study was taxpayer-funded.
Undisclosed data from the central claims in Lenski's 2008 paper are noted below (pp. 2-3 from paper, superscripts omitted):
Undisclosed data from the central claims in Lenski's 2008 paper are noted below (pp. 2-3 from paper, superscripts omitted):