3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 434:
Line 434: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 16:56, July 1, 2008
, 16:56, July 1, 2008→Lenski's second letter is censored: new section
:::::: That's simply not true, and has been raised plenty of times, Lenski is not necessarily with holding data from any experts, he's only failing to supply to *you*. Find an *actual biologist* with concerns about his work and maybe things will be different. Further name-calling does nothing to help your argument. [[User:Boatie|Boatie]] 10:00, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
:::::: That's simply not true, and has been raised plenty of times, Lenski is not necessarily with holding data from any experts, he's only failing to supply to *you*. Find an *actual biologist* with concerns about his work and maybe things will be different. Further name-calling does nothing to help your argument. [[User:Boatie|Boatie]] 10:00, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
== Lenski's second letter is censored ==
I find it quite ironic that conservapedia feels the need to censor links to rationalw1k1 (or even mention of the site). [[User:Earthisflat|Earthisflat]] 12:56, 1 July 2008 (EDT)