Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 434:
Line 434: − − == Lenski's second letter is censored == − − I find it quite ironic that conservapedia feels the need to censor links to rationalw1k1 (or even mention of the site). [[User:Earthisflat|Earthisflat]] 12:56, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 16:57, July 1, 2008
, 16:57, July 1, 2008Reverted edits by Earthisflat (Talk); changed back to last version by Philip J. Rayment
:::::: That's simply not true, and has been raised plenty of times, Lenski is not necessarily with holding data from any experts, he's only failing to supply to *you*. Find an *actual biologist* with concerns about his work and maybe things will be different. Further name-calling does nothing to help your argument. [[User:Boatie|Boatie]] 10:00, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
:::::: That's simply not true, and has been raised plenty of times, Lenski is not necessarily with holding data from any experts, he's only failing to supply to *you*. Find an *actual biologist* with concerns about his work and maybe things will be different. Further name-calling does nothing to help your argument. [[User:Boatie|Boatie]] 10:00, 1 July 2008 (EDT)