245
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + +
no edit summary
While the (now removed) linked page is somewhat... ''graphic'' in its descriptions, the author has a point. Aside from the random italics and blockquotes, the fact that a Conservapedia sysop used a Holocaust Denial site as reference for a biography is extremely troubling. An explanation would be appreciated. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 16:12, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
While the (now removed) linked page is somewhat... ''graphic'' in its descriptions, the author has a point. Aside from the random italics and blockquotes, the fact that a Conservapedia sysop used a Holocaust Denial site as reference for a biography is extremely troubling. An explanation would be appreciated. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 16:12, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
:It was most likely a mistake, the result of a random google search. But you are certainly right, it should have been removed immediately. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:27, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
:It was most likely a mistake, the result of a random google search. But you are certainly right, it should have been removed immediately. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:27, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
==Edits==
Following Andy's suggestion, I edited the article. At the moment, I mostly ordered the paragraphs in a way that makes more sense (starting with what she is most importantly known for, then moving to biography info, then the specific work section, then the misc. lists and stuff) and cut away some quotes. One of them was from a Holocaust Denial site, another was random praise, and the third was an excerpt from one of her works.
If nothing else happens, I'll likely improve the article some more these days. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 19:47, 1 July 2008 (EDT)