201
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 48:
Line 48: + +
no edit summary
:Hmmm, using scientific terms in an encyclopedia seems to be pretty appropriate. Of course, if we want to toss off the mantle of science, and go with a name that doesn't "deprive it of human rights", so be it. But then don't expect respect of the article as an academic resource. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 10:47, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
:Hmmm, using scientific terms in an encyclopedia seems to be pretty appropriate. Of course, if we want to toss off the mantle of science, and go with a name that doesn't "deprive it of human rights", so be it. But then don't expect respect of the article as an academic resource. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 10:47, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
::I understand the point, but some things go beyond science. Besides, I don't think Conservapedia is ever going to be considered much of an academic resource - academics are too liberal, and will just dismiss us no matter what language we use. We have an article on that, under [[Professor Values]] - we should be writing to appeal to conservatives, not academia. To conservatives, a baby is a baby no matter it's size or cell-count. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]