1,352
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + +
→Terminology
::I understand the point, but some things go beyond science. Besides, I don't think Conservapedia is ever going to be considered much of an academic resource - academics are too liberal, and will just dismiss us no matter what language we use. We have an article on that, under [[Professor Values]] - we should be writing to appeal to conservatives, not academia. To conservatives, a baby is a baby no matter it's size or cell-count. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
::I understand the point, but some things go beyond science. Besides, I don't think Conservapedia is ever going to be considered much of an academic resource - academics are too liberal, and will just dismiss us no matter what language we use. We have an article on that, under [[Professor Values]] - we should be writing to appeal to conservatives, not academia. To conservatives, a baby is a baby no matter it's size or cell-count. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
:::I understand that, but this site was originally set up to be used as an academic reference for home schoolers. If a home schooler used this site as a reference, and then went on to college and referred to a fetus or a zygote as a baby, I believe they would be corrected by the teacher. I am not suggesting that CP should be a resource for "academics" (i.e. professors), but rather an "academic resource" (useful for students). --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 11:51, 17 July 2008 (EDT)