34
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + +
no edit summary
"Followers of evolutionism"? This keeps getting weirder. If you can cite a source that discusses "evolutionism" and "following evolutionism" by anyone who claims to be a proponent I'd be heartily surprised.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 13:23, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
"Followers of evolutionism"? This keeps getting weirder. If you can cite a source that discusses "evolutionism" and "following evolutionism" by anyone who claims to be a proponent I'd be heartily surprised.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 13:23, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Until sources are cited and this page can be made fair to both sides of the issue (if possible), it should remain as a draft. After a time, if it cannot be made acceptable, we should just do away with it. There is no evidence shown (through citation or elsewhere) that "evolutionism" is anything more than a jargon used by a few creationists, and so cannot be considered to be used by the majority of conservatives (or anyone), thus does not warrant a page. --[[User:Dikaiosune|Dikaiosune]] 4:38 19 March 2007