1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + + +
Commentary on the Draft
Until sources are cited and this page can be made fair to both sides of the issue (if possible), it should remain as a draft. After a time, if it cannot be made acceptable, we should just do away with it. There is no evidence shown (through citation or elsewhere) that "evolutionism" is anything more than a jargon used by a few creationists, and so cannot be considered to be used by the majority of conservatives (or anyone), thus does not warrant a page. --[[User:Dikaiosune|Dikaiosune]] 4:38 19 March 2007
Until sources are cited and this page can be made fair to both sides of the issue (if possible), it should remain as a draft. After a time, if it cannot be made acceptable, we should just do away with it. There is no evidence shown (through citation or elsewhere) that "evolutionism" is anything more than a jargon used by a few creationists, and so cannot be considered to be used by the majority of conservatives (or anyone), thus does not warrant a page. --[[User:Dikaiosune|Dikaiosune]] 4:38 19 March 2007
== Commentary on the Draft ==
I'm sorry, but this whole thing deserves to die. There should be no "evolutionism" article unless it's about how it's a slur used against your average God-fearing, non-atheistic man-on-the-street who believes in evolution.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)