768
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + + + + + + + + + +
This is fun!
I'm sorry, but this whole thing deserves to die. There should be no "evolutionism" article unless it's about how it's a slur used against your average God-fearing, non-atheistic man-on-the-street who believes in evolution.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
I'm sorry, but this whole thing deserves to die. There should be no "evolutionism" article unless it's about how it's a slur used against your average God-fearing, non-atheistic man-on-the-street who believes in evolution.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
== This is fun! ==
I'm going to take credit for this entire article for objecting to being called an evolutionist. Can I take credit for it?
Oh... I don't understand this logic line of thought from the draft:
<code>There is no God (worldview) > Therefore we need to explain everything based on that "fact" > Thus science is altered based on the "no God" idea
Evolutionism comes before the Scientific Theory of Evolution. The theory is based on the worldview.</code>
It seems the entire premise is formed upon the idea that people that believe evolution happens believe there is no God. So... Atheism is the worldview, isn't it? Not evolutionism. And besides... NOT ALL PEOPLE THAT BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION ARE ATHEISTS. Mwar! Stop telling me I don't believe in God! [[User:Myk|Myk]] 18:30, 19 March 2007 (EDT)