Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
JP, I am not planning on removing the affair section, b/c frankly I couldn't care less if he had an affair or not. But regarding your comments in adding it back again---having an affair does not make him a lawbreaker. It is not against the law to have an affair. But as a foreigner, perhaps your country's laws are different. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 19:16, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
JP, I am not planning on removing the affair section, b/c frankly I couldn't care less if he had an affair or not. But regarding your comments in adding it back again---having an affair does not make him a lawbreaker. It is not against the law to have an affair. But as a foreigner, perhaps your country's laws are different. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 19:16, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
:If you want to play lawyer games with the word affair, than your argument has merit. Interfering in the marriage of another, adultery, is still a crime on the Ca. books, Penial 285. It was decriminalized in 1975 by then gov. Jerry Brown. No penalty for having an 'affair'. As for foreign from reality, don't step up to the mirror. This message signed by jp--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 19:36, 22 July 2008 (EDT)