Changes

:::: - Lenski has not disclosed key portions of his data, such as how thoroughly the samples were screened for pre-existing Cit⁺ variants at what specific generations these variants were actually observed in the replay experiments.  In fact, while the paper states the generation periods for the First (replay) Experiment, it does not disclose the generation periods for the Second and Third Experiments.

:::: - Lenski has not disclosed key portions of his data, such as how thoroughly the samples were screened for pre-existing Cit⁺ variants at what specific generations these variants were actually observed in the replay experiments.  In fact, while the paper states the generation periods for the First (replay) Experiment, it does not disclose the generation periods for the Second and Third Experiments.

::: I am requesting that the authors of the paper respond to each of the flaws in this forum and explain the withholding of the data, and submit a revision or retraction of their paper if any are held valid.

::: I am requesting that the authors of the paper respond to each of the flaws in this forum and explain the withholding of the data, and submit a revision or retraction of their paper if any are held valid. This public letter concerns taxpayer-funded research and your response, or lack thereof, will be made public.

 

''Mr. Schlafly, please let me know if this is acceptable, and apply any revisions as you see fit, thanks. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:38, 21 July 2008 (EDT)''

''Mr. Schlafly, please let me know if this is acceptable, and apply any revisions as you see fit, thanks. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:38, 21 July 2008 (EDT)''