122
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 150:
Line 150: + +
→Availability of data
::It seems more inappropriate to knowingly submit something to PNAS that is against their guidelines and then expecting them to edit the unacceptable comment out on their end. I'd suggest that the "PNAS Letters" submission will be taken more credibly if we respect their guidelines, and instead send the version with the "withholding data" accusation to the appropriate parties separately, and copy PNAS as a courtesy. My grandfather told me I'd never regret taking the high road, and 40-plus years later his advice has served me well. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:08, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
::It seems more inappropriate to knowingly submit something to PNAS that is against their guidelines and then expecting them to edit the unacceptable comment out on their end. I'd suggest that the "PNAS Letters" submission will be taken more credibly if we respect their guidelines, and instead send the version with the "withholding data" accusation to the appropriate parties separately, and copy PNAS as a courtesy. My grandfather told me I'd never regret taking the high road, and 40-plus years later his advice has served me well. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:08, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
::: I agree fully with DinsdaleP especially because i doubt that they may edit something out. i could imagine some copyright reasons will contradict that. --[[User:Stitch75|Stitch75]] 20:19, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
==My sixpenn'orth==
==My sixpenn'orth==