122
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 136:
Line 136: + +
→Completion of the cc: list
:I agree with what you have said. I think we should send out a separate letter to the congresspeople. There are two separate, though very related issues. The rigor of the experiment (this is what PNAS deals with) and the fact that such research is given funding (Congress and the watchdog groups have to do with this part). Lets address the first problem before we look at the second. -[[User:RoyS|RoyS]] 17:05, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
:I agree with what you have said. I think we should send out a separate letter to the congresspeople. There are two separate, though very related issues. The rigor of the experiment (this is what PNAS deals with) and the fact that such research is given funding (Congress and the watchdog groups have to do with this part). Lets address the first problem before we look at the second. -[[User:RoyS|RoyS]] 17:05, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
: If the letter should find a broader audience, I would find i terribly interesting what the scientific advisors of the presidential candidates have to say about this. --[[User:Stitch75|Stitch75]] 20:22, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
==Link in Letter==
==Link in Letter==