Changes

: I am correcting you because your comment about Eagle Forum and my teaching program for precollege students is baseless and wrong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:08, 29 July 2008 (EDT)

: I am correcting you because your comment about Eagle Forum and my teaching program for precollege students is baseless and wrong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:08, 29 July 2008 (EDT)

::For one who often complains of insulting comments from others, that was an unnecessarily hostile response. The line "please correct me if this is wrong" was straightforwardly ''asking'' for clarification. The appropriate response would have been, "My function as a teacher is not carried out in association with the Eagle Forum, so listing that as my affiliation would be inaccurate." It didn't warrant such an accusatory tone. That's the second time you've had a reaction like that to the Eagle Forum even being mentioned. Please read before you judge.[[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 22:54, 29 July 2008 (EDT)

::For one who often complains of insulting comments from others, that was an unnecessarily hostile response. The line "please correct me if this is wrong" was straightforwardly ''asking'' for clarification. The appropriate response would have --[[User:Stitch75|Stitch75]] 12:45, 30 July 2008 (EDT)been, "My function as a teacher is not carried out in association with the Eagle Forum, so listing that as my affiliation would be inaccurate." It didn't warrant such an accusatory tone. That's the second time you've had a reaction like that to the Eagle Forum even being mentioned. Please read before you judge.[[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 22:54, 29 July 2008 (EDT)

::: The conspiracy theories by liberals about conservatives are tiresome, and the liberal denials when confronted with the baseless errors are even worse.  Wikipedia is filled with such junk, claiming that anyone the liberals disagree with is a creationist, a John Birch Society member, or some cultist.  When the errors are removed, they reappear again and again, without apology by the people who make the errors.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:17, 29 July 2008 (EDT)

::: The conspiracy theories by liberals about conservatives are tiresome, and the liberal denials when confronted with the baseless errors are even worse.  Wikipedia is filled with such junk, claiming that anyone the liberals disagree with is a creationist, a John Birch Society member, or some cultist.  When the errors are removed, they reappear again and again, without apology by the people who make the errors.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:17, 29 July 2008 (EDT)

:::::Corry is correct- it was ''just a question''. And there are five problems with Aschlafly's response, all baseless claims of his own: 1) Where is the conspiracy theory he refers to (affiliation and conspiracy are not synonymous)? 2) Where is the denial of his correction that he is not affiliated with [won't mention the name since three out of three times it has been even mentioned, there have been very hostile responses]? There- I acknowledge that there is no affiliation with said other organization. 3) How did the original affiliations comment or my posts indicate political leanings (I in fact do not fit Aschlafly's description of liberals)? 4)What exactly was the error? "As far as I understand it" followed by "please correct me if I'm wrong" are not hallmarks of "baseless claims". The post simply demonstrated and incorrect understanding and a desire to assess its accuracy, a very rational approach. 5) What do any of Aschlafly's disagreements with Wikipedia have to do with being ''asked'' about affiliations on this site?[[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 09:01, 30 July 2008 (EDT)

:::::Corry is correct- it was ''just a question''. And there are five problems with Aschlafly's response, all baseless claims of his own: 1) Where is the conspiracy theory he refers to (affiliation and conspiracy are not synonymous)? 2) Where is the denial of his correction that he is not affiliated with [won't mention the name since three out of three times it has been even mentioned, there have been very hostile responses]? There- I acknowledge that there is no affiliation with said other organization. 3) How did the original affiliations comment or my posts indicate political leanings (I in fact do not fit Aschlafly's description of liberals)? 4)What exactly was the error? "As far as I understand it" followed by "please correct me if I'm wrong" are not hallmarks of "baseless claims". The post simply demonstrated and incorrect understanding and a desire to assess its accuracy, a very rational approach. 5) What do any of Aschlafly's disagreements with Wikipedia have to do with being ''asked'' about affiliations on this site?[[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 09:01, 30 July 2008 (EDT)