Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 191: Line 191:     
::::::::On the contrary- if there is sound statistical evidence showing an association between liberal political views and having more sexual partners or a higher incidence of STDs, then I will concede that particular point. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 13:07, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 
::::::::On the contrary- if there is sound statistical evidence showing an association between liberal political views and having more sexual partners or a higher incidence of STDs, then I will concede that particular point. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 13:07, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::::: Now you try an entirely new approach by introducing the implausible condition of "if there is sound statistical evidence showing ...."  Of course no one is likely to pay for such a study, for several reasons.  First, it's politically incorrect and second, it's obvious.
 +
 +
::::::::: You have free will to reject logic.  Belief/acceptance of promiscuity is undeniably correlated to more promiscuity, and hence more STDs and infertility.  We don't need a study to prove logic, and it's [[liberal denial]] to claim that one is necessary.  Suit yourself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:33, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
    
==Quick question==
 
==Quick question==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,256

edits

Navigation menu