169
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − [[Image:Funny monkey.jpg|thumb|center|The author invites constructive criticism of this blog entry.]]'''Liberal logic''' is an argument by [[liberal]]s that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples:+ Line 26:
Line 26: − + Line 36:
Line 36: + + +
Undo revision 494427 by RichT (Talk)
'''Liberal logic''' is an argument by [[liberal]]s that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples:
# insisting that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it
# insisting that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it
# The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but [[liberals]] find that illogical today. This does not mean to replace the word 'she' on the article for Hillary Clinton with 'he'.
# The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but [[liberals]] find that illogical today. This does not mean to replace the word 'she' on the article for Hillary Clinton with 'he'.
# Getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not.
# Getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not.
# The [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.
*[[Liberal hysteria]]
*[[Liberal hysteria]]
*[[Liberal hate speech]]
*[[Liberal hate speech]]
*[[Liberal style]]
*[[Liberal denial]]
*[[Liberal obfuscation]]
*[[Liberal quotient]]
*[[Liberal quotient]]
*[[Liberal friendship]]
*[[Liberal friendship]]