Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:     
== Battleground States ==
 
== Battleground States ==
−
The United States has become so regionally polarized that even though the 2004 presidential election was close nationwide, only nine states had outcomes having less than 4% margin between the candidates:
+
The United States had become so regionally polarized that even though the 2004 presidential election was close nationwide, only nine states had outcomes having less than 4% margin between the candidates:
    
State, margin of victory, party that won the state in 2004
 
State, margin of victory, party that won the state in 2004
Line 38: Line 38:  
#Michigan, 3.42% (Dem)
 
#Michigan, 3.42% (Dem)
 
#Minnesota, 3.48% (Dem)
 
#Minnesota, 3.48% (Dem)
 +
 +
It is assumed that the 2008 election will be similar where close battles in a few states could determine the outcome.  Individual state polling numbers for the 2008 election:
 +
 +
#Alaska (McCain 44% - Obama 40%)  [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/alaska/election_2008_alaska_presidential_election Rasmussen Updated 8/1/08]
 +
    
[[CNN]] declares that the outcome in [[McCain]] v. [[Obama]] is a toss-up in only 12 states, totaling only 154 electors:<ref>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/10/electoral.map/index.html</ref> (Most recent poll numbers, and polling outfit)
 
[[CNN]] declares that the outcome in [[McCain]] v. [[Obama]] is a toss-up in only 12 states, totaling only 154 electors:<ref>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/10/electoral.map/index.html</ref> (Most recent poll numbers, and polling outfit)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu