Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,253
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + +
Debate:Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided? (view source)
Revision as of 19:32, August 12, 2008
, 19:32, August 12, 2008→Conservapedia is one-sided
Conservapedia may be one-sided, but the real question is "Who Cares?" The conservative side rarely gets presented accurately anywhere else, especially in the news media. To have a wiki explicitly dedicated to espousing the conservative point of view should not be counted as a defect, but as a virtue. [[User:TJason|TJason]] 15:26, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
Conservapedia may be one-sided, but the real question is "Who Cares?" The conservative side rarely gets presented accurately anywhere else, especially in the news media. To have a wiki explicitly dedicated to espousing the conservative point of view should not be counted as a defect, but as a virtue. [[User:TJason|TJason]] 15:26, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
:That's largely my point, TJason. However, in response to your question, I think we (the users) should care--because we should be very open and unapologetic about the fact that this is a site that propagates a conservative point of view. Let others complain, argue, and attempt vandalism; that simply makes it clear that they're the ones being unreasonable and intolerant, to the point where they're incapable of respecting the desire of conservatives to have a site dedicated to discussing our point of view.
:Any concessions to the concept of "neutrality" simply provide fodder for those who want to dilute Conservapedia, and an excuse for them to say, "Well, gee, I was just trying to make the article more neutral!" --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 15:32, 12 August 2008 (EDT)