13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Debate:Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided? (view source)
Revision as of 19:51, August 12, 2008
, 19:51, August 12, 2008→Conservapedia is one-sided
:Any concessions to the concept of "neutrality" simply provide fodder for those who want to dilute Conservapedia, and an excuse for them to say, "Well, gee, I was just trying to make the article more neutral!" --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 15:32, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
:Any concessions to the concept of "neutrality" simply provide fodder for those who want to dilute Conservapedia, and an excuse for them to say, "Well, gee, I was just trying to make the article more neutral!" --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 15:32, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
::Aye. Lines in the sand, and all that; purity of essence... Otherwise, how can the truth set us free? This site is growing rapidly! Full Godspeed ahead! --[[User:Frieda|Frieda]] 15:51, 12 August 2008 (EDT)