Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Iran/Contra: journalists
Line 246: Line 246:  
:::Let me add, as an after thought, all accounts I read all over the web dismiss this all as a "scandal" of a bunch of greedy arms dealers and other assorted low-lifes which either includes Reagan, or Reagan gave his assent to.  That POV has been explicitely stated eleswhere.  So what we are examining is the motives for Reagan's giving assent to this matter.  And beginning with a conclusory premise, that (a) Reagan's just another greedy corrupt Republican (b) this is just more evidence of the currupt aims, motives, and duplicity of Republicans in power and why you can't trust them, will fail.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:20, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Let me add, as an after thought, all accounts I read all over the web dismiss this all as a "scandal" of a bunch of greedy arms dealers and other assorted low-lifes which either includes Reagan, or Reagan gave his assent to.  That POV has been explicitely stated eleswhere.  So what we are examining is the motives for Reagan's giving assent to this matter.  And beginning with a conclusory premise, that (a) Reagan's just another greedy corrupt Republican (b) this is just more evidence of the currupt aims, motives, and duplicity of Republicans in power and why you can't trust them, will fail.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:20, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
--[[User:TK|TK]] 03:35, 19 March 2007 (EDT)==Iraq==
+
==Iraq==
 +
 
 +
--[[User:TK|TK]] 03:35, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
    
'''Comment on this inclusion''':''although the U.S. government under Reagan gave direct support to Iraq during the war. President Ronald Reagan stated that the United States "could not afford to allow Iraq to lose the war to Iran", and that the United States "would do whatever was necessary and legal to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran.");''  
 
'''Comment on this inclusion''':''although the U.S. government under Reagan gave direct support to Iraq during the war. President Ronald Reagan stated that the United States "could not afford to allow Iraq to lose the war to Iran", and that the United States "would do whatever was necessary and legal to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran.");''  
Line 266: Line 268:     
*Indeed.  Welcome to my world.  I console myself knowing that sooner or later (usually later) the public gets damned mad, and there is literally political hell to pay.  I have been waiting for that now about 7 years.  Look at http://newt.org for American Solutions....something is being done, and the ground work being layed. --[[User:TK|TK]] 03:35, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
*Indeed.  Welcome to my world.  I console myself knowing that sooner or later (usually later) the public gets damned mad, and there is literally political hell to pay.  I have been waiting for that now about 7 years.  Look at http://newt.org for American Solutions....something is being done, and the ground work being layed. --[[User:TK|TK]] 03:35, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:The public wouldn't get mad if they stopped eating up all the journalists and the paid purveyors if lies lies.  Truth is, news items have a shelf life, and a "sell by" date.  Journalists do not care if (1) four years later Saddam indeed invades Kuwait as Iran/Contra tried to head off, or (b) 20 years later Iran still isn't an ally and now is a hostile power seeking nuclear weapons.  All  these scandalmongers wish to do is build careers, create and sell interesting news items, and the world be damned if consequences down the road surface as a result of thier actions.  They're always in the postion to blame others.  And as P.T. Barnum said, there's a sucker born every minute to buy thier lies.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:51, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,469

edits

Navigation menu