Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:     
:::Well Jack, we have cites to demonstrate Reagans Defense spending in the early 80s virtually spent the Soviet Union out of existence, because they could not keep up.  Gorbachav has virtually admitted as much.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:39, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Well Jack, we have cites to demonstrate Reagans Defense spending in the early 80s virtually spent the Soviet Union out of existence, because they could not keep up.  Gorbachav has virtually admitted as much.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:39, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::I have cites that say Reagan's spending extended the length of the Soviet Union's existence, I have cites that say internal social movements in the Eastern Bloc ended the Soviet Union, I have cites that the Peace movement in the United States was what brought about the changes in Reagan's attitude change that led to his willingness to open up negotiation space.  However, I wouldn't make the claim that any of these provide the strongest explanatory power.  Having cites doesn't confirm or disconfirm anything, it only provides one plausible explanation for an event.  Selective citing is just as biased as no citing at all and, in fact, is more academically dishonest.--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 00:15, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
    
I think you are all too exciteable.  This is the '''Conservative''' pedia, not Wikipedia.  Go peddle your liberal, and liberal-sourced material elsewhere. --[[User:TK|TK]] 21:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I think you are all too exciteable.  This is the '''Conservative''' pedia, not Wikipedia.  Go peddle your liberal, and liberal-sourced material elsewhere. --[[User:TK|TK]] 21:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
86

edits

Navigation menu