nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:How to write an article (view source)
Revision as of 04:30, August 30, 2008
, 04:30, August 30, 2008→"Sweeping" condemnations: new section
This entire article is deeply troubling, and that's coming from somebody who is by God no fan of liberals. It appears to be a ''carte blanche'' that justifies bashing of liberals and protects such articles from correction - especially without some sort of definition of "liberal evil" or who gets to decide what counts as such. For hopefully obvious reasons, I oppose the current version of this guideline. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 17:02, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
This entire article is deeply troubling, and that's coming from somebody who is by God no fan of liberals. It appears to be a ''carte blanche'' that justifies bashing of liberals and protects such articles from correction - especially without some sort of definition of "liberal evil" or who gets to decide what counts as such. For hopefully obvious reasons, I oppose the current version of this guideline. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 17:02, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
== "Sweeping" condemnations ==
"''Never imply that a sweeping condemnation of liberal evils is "wrong" or "exaggerated".''": I would rather say, "Never make ''sweeping'' condemnation of liberal evils". Condemnation of ''specific'' evils is okay, but ''sweeping'' condemnation should always be avoided, I would think. I also have reservations about other aspects of this proposal. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:30, 30 August 2008 (EDT)