nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: +
Conservapedia talk:How to write an article (view source)
Revision as of 06:53, August 31, 2008
, 06:53, August 31, 2008→"Sweeping" condemnations: Move to guidelines if and when agreed.
::But you're right; it should be merged into the guidelines somehow. Got any ideas? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:15, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
::But you're right; it should be merged into the guidelines somehow. Got any ideas? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:15, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
:::...yeah, I got an idea. Both Philip and I voiced criticism of this "proposed guideline" (with Philip implicitly reserving the right of voicing more), so maybe you should address those before marching ahead and turning your "proposed guideline" into an actual guideline. And if the "Project Director" (A. Schlafly?) supports such a liberal-bashing amnesty, I would be quite disturbed. An encyclopedia project shouldn't bash anybody, regardless of the own position. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 14:45, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
:::...yeah, I got an idea. Both Philip and I voiced criticism of this "proposed guideline" (with Philip implicitly reserving the right of voicing more), so maybe you should address those before marching ahead and turning your "proposed guideline" into an actual guideline. And if the "Project Director" (A. Schlafly?) supports such a liberal-bashing amnesty, I would be quite disturbed. An encyclopedia project shouldn't bash anybody, regardless of the own position. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 14:45, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
:::: I would think that if and when this is approved, ''then'' it gets transferred to the Guidelines page. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:53, 31 August 2008 (EDT)