220
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + +
Talk:Overcoming homosexuality (view source)
Revision as of 03:37, September 2, 2008
, 03:37, September 2, 2008→Just wondering
::::I think I keep stuck to things I know more about (as geography, politics and history), I just came across this article, and though it is a subject I know very little about, something told me that the style it is written in is too inflected by personal opinions (I have actually not heard anyone say to me in person that overcoming homosexuality is possible), and the statements in the article are not affirmed by any agreeing scientists etc. I'm not here to make trouble, I just want to point out that this and many other articles have many weaknesses: Lack of references to agreeing scientists and specialists are often weakening the article's trust – maybe not for everyone, but to most experienced wiki contributors it is striking. [[User:Efloean|Efloean]] 15:38, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
::::I think I keep stuck to things I know more about (as geography, politics and history), I just came across this article, and though it is a subject I know very little about, something told me that the style it is written in is too inflected by personal opinions (I have actually not heard anyone say to me in person that overcoming homosexuality is possible), and the statements in the article are not affirmed by any agreeing scientists etc. I'm not here to make trouble, I just want to point out that this and many other articles have many weaknesses: Lack of references to agreeing scientists and specialists are often weakening the article's trust – maybe not for everyone, but to most experienced wiki contributors it is striking. [[User:Efloean|Efloean]] 15:38, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
:::::Conservapedia is intended first and foremost as an educational and moral resource for young people. We value conciseness with accuracy, rather than the endless talk, talk practiced by some so-called online encyclopaedias. You can trust what is written in that article. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 15:43, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
:::::Conservapedia is intended first and foremost as an educational and moral resource for young people. We value conciseness with accuracy, rather than the endless talk, talk practiced by some so-called online encyclopaedias. You can trust what is written in that article. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 15:43, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
It sounds like his major gripe is that the only evidence being presented is anecdotal by "ex-homosexuals" and quotations from the Bible. Honestly, if this is so, he does have a point. And I do not think he is being disruptive. He's being critical (which is a neutral term) and. well. thinking critically. That's ultimatly a good thing.[[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:37, 1 September 2008 (EDT)