Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte removed ,  09:50, March 20, 2007
m
spelling
Line 35: Line 35:  
In several controversies over the legality of displaying the Ten Commandments on government property, and especially outside courthouses, the influence of the ten commandments on US law becomes relevant as proponents of the displays argue that these commandments form part of the foundation of the US legal system.
 
In several controversies over the legality of displaying the Ten Commandments on government property, and especially outside courthouses, the influence of the ten commandments on US law becomes relevant as proponents of the displays argue that these commandments form part of the foundation of the US legal system.
   −
1. This is not only unmentioned in US law, but is specifically opposed by the First Amendment to the Constitution itself. Any attempt to impose the belief or non-believe in a particular God by legal means is strictly prohibited.
+
1. This is not only unmentioned in US law, but is specifically opposed by the First Amendment to the Constitution itself. Any attempt to impose the belief or non-belief in a particular God by legal means is strictly prohibited.
    
2. In a similar way, the first amendment, by protecting freedom of speech, explicitly forbids any legal means of enforcing the second commandment - which is itself a restriction on speech.
 
2. In a similar way, the first amendment, by protecting freedom of speech, explicitly forbids any legal means of enforcing the second commandment - which is itself a restriction on speech.
444

edits

Navigation menu