Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
233 bytes added ,  21:21, September 10, 2008
m
Reverted edits by SonsOfLiberty (Talk); changed back to last version by NathanG
Line 1: Line 1: −
In '''''Ashcroft v. ACLU''''', 542 U.S. 656 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]].
+
In '''''Ashcroft v. ACLU''''', 542 U.S. 656 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  
   −
This law, which the Supreme Court struck down, was hallmarked as an invasion in the private lives of Americans.  
+
This law, which the Supreme Court struck down, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification.  
   −
The Court pissed off a lot of Conservatives when they struck down the Child Online Protection Act. Parenting was too hard for them, and they needed help from the Government.  
+
The Court shifted the burden to families to screen out the pornography rather than  requiring the companies profiting from the pornography to keep its own pollution from children.
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
12,071

edits

Navigation menu