1,116
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − In '''''Ashcroft v. ACLU''''', 542 U.S. 656 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet. + − − This law, which the Supreme Court struck down, did not censor a single word or picture. It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification. − − The Court shifted the burden to families to screen out the pornography rather than requiring the companies profiting from the pornography to keep its own pollution from children. − [[Category:Law]]
no edit summary
▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀