5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − <!--{{User Vandalized|9}}-->+ − + Line 7:
Line 7: − − <Big>'''My Editing Philosophy'''</big> − *Noncontroversial edits are ''usually'' ok − *I will always follow the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|Guidelines]] and [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]] − *I won't change work from the editors who are never wrong, unless I really, really, really know what I am doing − *I won't edit or comment on essay pages; they are supposed to be opinion − *I will point out and correct when an article is unencyclopedic, but will back down when defending my action is futile − *I will point out and correct when an article does not follow the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|Guidelines]] or [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]], but will back down when defending my action is futile − *I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project − *I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words − *There is no official block policy, so I will use my own judgement for blocking people − *I will never block someone for being non-conservative (for starters, I would have to block myself) − *I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil − *I will never block someone for violating the [[90/10 rule]] − *I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory − *I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs) − *I will never block someone for referring to or showing up on That Which Shall Not Be Named (and no, I can't tell you what it is, and no, I can not give you any hints) − *If a block is properly given, then no apology should ever be needed as an unblocking condition − *I will not unblock myself if blocked by a sysop − − Some who think they are more rational than me may say that I'm a wimp for backing down. I say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result. Line 33:
Line 12: − *I (still) support [[Ron Paul]] for Republican Presidential nominee+ − **I'm currently undecided as to whom I will vote for, but I will never vote for [[Obama]], [[Nader]], any [[Green Party]] candidate, or any [[left-wing]] candidates (aka Socialist party and those other wingnuts). The only wingnut I might vote for is [[Bob Barr]], but from what little I know about him, he's kind of a "blah" candidate. − − **I have a pretty strong background in fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer, [[thermodynamics]], etc. etc. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + − +
been a while
{{userboxtop|HelpJazz}}
{{userboxtop|HelpJazz}}
{{User Vandalized|10}}
{{Userbox|#6ef7a7|#c5fcdc|3,000|This user has made over 3,000 edits to Conservapedia}}
{{Userbox|#6ef7a7|#c5fcdc|5,500|This user has made over 5,500 edits to Conservapedia}}
{{Template:User Libertarian}}
{{Template:User Libertarian}}
{{User political compass|5.00|-2.92}}
{{User political compass|5.00|-2.92}}
{{userboxbottom}}
{{userboxbottom}}
[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|right|'''HelpJazz''' is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar for tireless vigilance against "rational" and irrational vandals & trolls!]]
[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|right|'''HelpJazz''' is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar for tireless vigilance against "rational" and irrational vandals & trolls!]]
<big>'''About Me'''</big>
<big>'''About Me'''</big>
**Actually, I'm a social and economic [[conservative]]. The difference between me and most conservatives is not what I believe, but where I think the government should step in for my beliefs.
**Actually, I'm a social and economic [[conservative]]. The difference between me and most conservatives is not what I believe, but where I think the government should step in for my beliefs.
**Feel free to ask me about my positions. I love talking politics with open-minded, rational people
**Feel free to ask me about my positions. I love talking politics with open-minded, rational people
*In 2008 I graduated from [[Bucknell University]] with a [[bachelor of science]] degree in [[chemical engineering]]. Now I'm a financial analyst at a commercial door company.
*In 2008 I graduated from [[Bucknell University]] with a [[bachelor of science]] degree in [[chemical engineering]]
**I was at one point pursuing a minor in [[political science]]
**I was at one point pursuing a minor in [[political science]]
***I have a good working base of political science, political theory and [[international politics]]
***I have a good working base of political science, political theory and [[international politics]]
**I also have taken courses in [[economics]], [[logic]], and [[probability]]
**I also have taken courses in [[economics]], [[logic]], and [[probability]]
**Now my work life revolves around [[Microsoft Excel]].
<Big>'''My Editing Philosophy'''</big>
#Noncontroversial edits are ''usually'' ok
#I will always follow the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|Guidelines]] and [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]] (G&C)
#I will attempt to make all articles follow the G&C, and encourage other editors to do likewise
#Essay pages are opinion
#Mainspace pages are fact
#''No [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Aziraphale/Tilting_at_Windmills&oldid=296120 tilting at windmills]!
#I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project
#I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words
#The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result
<big>'''Pet Peeves'''</big>
(In no particular order)
#Plagiarism is the use of another's words as one's own without giving proper credit. This is true even if you "paid for it" and have permission to use it
#Selected examples do ''not'' prove a trend. If you want to show that "most people do X" by example, you can never prove your point with examples
#Don't use "literally" if you mean "figuratively". Don't use "literally" if there's no figurative way to take what you say.
#Improper use of political lables. "Conservative" may, in most cases, be the opposite of "liberal", but there are numerous other ideologies which don't line up on a 1-dimentional scale!
#Improper use of numbers! (P(BC|Ab)>P(BC|P) does not imply that P(BC|Ab)>P(BC)!!)
#"Ironic" means that something happened opposite to what you expect to happen. A woman getting hit and killed by a sugar truck is sad. A diabetic woman getting hit and killed by a sugar truck is coincidence. A diabetic woman getting hit and killed by an ''insulin'' truck is ironic.
#Finding "please add more" on a wiki page. For one, lists rarely make a good article (and often contribute to pet peeve #2); additionally, all wikis are works in progress, so there's always an implied assumption to add more to an article.
#More to come <!-- now *that* is ironic humor -->
<big>'''Useful Links'''</big>
*[[User:Philip J. Rayment/Article renaming project]]
*[[Conservapedia:Desk]]
<small>Subs: [[/chemredlinks]], [[/Contest]], [[/refs]], [[/workspace]], [[/chemeng]]
<small>Subs: [[/chemredlinks]], [[/Contest]], [[/refs]], [[/workspace]], [[/chemeng]], [[/templates]], [[/irg]]