3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 113:
Line 113: +
User talk:HelpJazz (view source)
Revision as of 20:53, September 16, 2008
, 20:53, September 16, 2008→Bipolar disorder
:He's reverted you anyway. Where do we go from here? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 16:39, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
:He's reverted you anyway. Where do we go from here? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 16:39, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::My belief in big science? Bugler, aren't you supposed to be convincing people that you aren't a parodist? Unfortunately, Sideways, there's not a lot we can do unless a sysop intervenes, since he has blocking rights. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:49, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::My belief in big science? Bugler, aren't you supposed to be convincing people that you aren't a parodist? Unfortunately, Sideways, there's not a lot we can do unless a sysop intervenes, since he has blocking rights. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:49, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
:::I don't block for ideological reasons, as you well know, though I would be within my rights to block for that disgraceful insinuation. As for 'Big Science', what is wrong with what I said? Do you believe that scientists are incapable of lying, are incapable of twisting results, are incapable of being influenced by prior agendas? Just look at the way that nutritional advice changes from one month to the next - and always backed up by the best scientific credentails. And psychiatry/ology is the worst of the lot. One day Freudianism is the flavour of the month, then we're all Jungians; now CBT (dog training, as I prefer to think of it) is the panacea. If you attach 'fact' tags to what I wrote, then each of your assertions should have ten! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:53, 16 September 2008 (EDT)