560
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: +
User talk:HelpJazz (view source)
Revision as of 21:02, September 16, 2008
, 21:02, September 16, 2008→Bipolar disorder
::::You'll never guess what I found in my sock last night! Go ahead, guess! [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:54, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::::You'll never guess what I found in my sock last night! Go ahead, guess! [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:54, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::Ohhh what'd you find? Bugler: the insinuation was that you could unblock yourself. That you thought I was insinuating that you would block someone on ideological reasons is, well, pretty telling. If you think that change isn't part of science and makes science wrong, then you really have a lot of learning to do. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:56, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::Ohhh what'd you find? Bugler: the insinuation was that you could unblock yourself. That you thought I was insinuating that you would block someone on ideological reasons is, well, pretty telling. If you think that change isn't part of science and makes science wrong, then you really have a lot of learning to do. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:56, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::::::::::I'm astonished. I don't know what the phrase 'Big science' is intended to mean, but is it really the intention of this site to discredit such well established and successful sciences of psychiatry & psychology? You say they are just feeling around in the dark, Bugler. Why? The sciences are built on observed causes and results. Bipolar disorder is believed to be hereditary, not just because it's a convenient theory, but because of the overwhelming burden of cases suggesting this. You seem to reject this, while also trying to apply the same methodology yourself, in your claim that there are correlations between bipolar disorder and political views, and you have provided no evidence for this. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 17:02, 16 September 2008 (EDT)